This is a series of posts including inspiring images/videos/articles selected by me.You can take part you just have to send me the link to the image/video/article and I will include it in the list under your name.
You can send it to me via email: ikab@live.de or over http://twitter.com/ikab
This is a series of posts including inspiring images/videos/articles selected by me.You can take part you just have to send me the link to the image/video/article and I will include it in the list under your name.
You can send it to me via email: ikab@live.de or over http://twitter.com/ikab
This is a series of posts including inspiring images/videos/articles selected by me.You can take part you just have to send me the link to the image/video/article and I will include it in the list under your name.
You can send it to me via email: ikab@live.de or over http://twitter.com/ikab
This is a series of posts including inspiring images/videos/articles selected by me.You can take part you just have to send me the link to the image/video/article and I will include it in the list under your name.
You can send it to me via email: ikab@live.de or over http://twitter.com/ikab
This is a series of posts including inspiring images/videos/articles selected by me.You can take part you just have to send me the link to the image/video/article and I will include it in the list under your name.
You can send it to me via email: ikab@live.de or over http://twitter.com/ikab
Congratulations! They look amazing but card number 4 “The Believer” should be IV instead of IIII.
Jurgi, after doing some research I discovered that tarot cards traditionally use “IIII” to represent “4″ as opposed to roman numeral “IV”. I thought it was strange, but decided to stick with the traditional numbering.
You can see an en example of the numbering here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tarockkarten_in_der_Hand_eines_Spielers.jpg
Glad you enjoy them!
Great job!! is the first time I see the number “IIII” in a tarot card, there is a lot of tarot cards with the “IV” even in the wikipedia articule about tarot, (sorry for my english), Congratulations!
Wonderful job! you capture every character esssence with those stylish and awesome symbols…
two kinds of 4’s are accepted, actually ‘IIII’ is the original.
These are bold!!!! I really like the graphics and can appreciate their imagery. They really are very strong:)
Best to you,
Carolyn
Tarot reader and Webmaster of http://tarotreadingpsychic.com
There’s a theory that says that the original tarot has roman acumulative numbers in the Arcana Mayor’s because every sucessive card it’s and evolution that the precedent.
In the traditional numbering some cards could be interpreted that are less than others, because some numbers are do it by rest:
Four (IV)<Five (V), because 4 (IV)= 1-5.
In this acummulative numbering every card is a part the the sucessive cards need, because without all the precedents it number wouldn't exist, and all it's done with sums.
Four (IIII) part of Five (V), because 5 (V)= IIII+I.
In this way you wouldn't see in this way a left number smaller thant the right number (a rest), it's inverse (a sum):
9= IX or VIIII
IX it's only posibly doing a rest: X-I.
VIIII it's only possibly doing a sum: V+IIII
(I hope you understand it)
____________________________________
Good work!! I love the cards.
If you want to continue and improve, and you want some suggestions contact me (I say this because the characters could be more similiar with other numbers card, if you compare with the tarot, at least with Marsella's that's that I like). It's a tarot and lost lover opinion only, do what do you want at your own way!